Christian Educators And Connective Learning: An Empirical Survey Study

Authors

  • Edwin STT Kingdom Bali
  • Desak Putu Jeny Ganesha University of Education, Denpasar, Indonesia

Keywords:

The role of Christian teachers, Connectivity Learning, The era of digital transformation

Abstract

This study aims to find out the role of Christian teachers in Denpasar in developing communicative learning in the era of digital transformation as well as the most significant factors that affect the role of teachers in the development of learning. The research method used was an explanatory survey, using a questionnaire distributed to 47 Christian teachers in Denpasar. The data obtained were analysed using a regression model to evaluate the relationship between various teacher roles (as facilitators, knowledge curators, promoters of diverse perspectives, promoters of lifelong learning, promoters of collaboration, technology guides, and evaluators of learning connections) and the development of connective learning. The results of the study show that the role of Christian teachers in Denpasar in developing connective learning in the era of digital transformation has been going well and the role of teachers as promoters of collaboration and social learning is the most significant role in developing connective learning.

References

Adebule, I. O. (2009). The effective use of educational technology for religious education teaching: Learning amongst secondary schools in Lagos State, Nigeria. International Journal of Learning, 15(12), 141 – 146. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v15i12/46041

Ahmed, H. S. (2025). Descriptive statistics for cardiothoracic surgeons: part 2 — the foundation of data interpretation. Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 41(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-024-01855-x

Anjaria, K. (2022). Knowledge derivation from Likert scale using Z-numbers. Information Sciences, 590, 234–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.01.024

Arif Muadzin, A. M. (2021). Konsepsi Peran Guru Sebagai Fasilitator dan Motivator Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.37286/ojs.v7i2.102

Aslam, M. (2024). The t-test of a regression coefficient for imprecise data. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 53(4), 1130–1140. https://doi.org/10.15672/hujms.1342344

Becerra, B. B., Reyes, S. V, Hernández, A. G., Elizondo, P. V, & Gonzalez, A. M. (2021). Good practice guide for data visualization in the area of descriptive statistics. 2021 Mexican International Conference on Computer Science, ENC 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/ENC53357.2021.9534814

Beed, C., & Beed, C. (2015). Jesus on Cooperation. Transformation: An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies, 32(2), 97 – 111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265378814536653

Beri, N. (2018). Academic Performance, Social Adjustment and Emotional Intelligence of Students Involved in Social Networking Sites. Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development, 9(11), 1971–1976. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2018.01741.2

Boitshwarelo, B. (2011). Proposing an integrated research framework for connectivism: Utilising theoretical synergies. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.881

Burke, K. J., & Segal, A. (2015). Teaching as Jesus making: The hidden curriculum of Christ in schooling. Teachers College Record, 117(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511700306

Cettolin, A. U. (2024). Christ-enlivened practices: An action research investigation of shared meals in a higher education classroom. International Journal of Christianity and Education, 28(1), 71 – 87. https://doi.org/10.1177/20569971231174841

Coelho, D. A. (2015). Learning theories supporting massive open online courses. In Furthering Higher Education Possibilities through Massive Open Online Courses (pp. 125–149). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8279-5.ch006

Cyr, C., Cataldo, T. T., Brannon, B., Buhler, A. G., Faniel, I. M., Connaway, L. S., Valenza, J. K., Elrod, R., & Putnam, S. R. (2021). Backgrounds and behaviors: Which students successfully identify online resources in the I face of container collapse. First Monday, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v26i3.10871

Czerkawski, B. C. (2016). Networked learning: design considerations for online instructors. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8), 1850–1863. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1057744

Davis, K. L., Kliewer, B. W., & Nicolaides, A. (2017). Power and reciprocity in partnerships: Deliberative civic engagement and transformative learning in community-engaged scholarship. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 21(1), 30–54. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85016632191&partnerID=40&md5=a2457c7245be9d0d6d6aea95237afea9

De Muth, J. E. (2019). Descriptive Statistics and Univariate Analysis. In AAPS Advances in the Pharmaceutical Sciences Series (Vol. 40, pp. 19–36). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33989-0_2

Descriptive Statistics. (2024). In Understanding Communication Research Methods: A Theoretical and Practical Approach, Fourth Edition (pp. 199–218). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003432173-17

Dockx, E., Verhoest, K., Langbroek, T., & Wynen, J. (2023). Bringing together unlikely innovators: do connective and learning capacities impact collaboration for innovation and diversity of actors? Public Management Review, 25(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.2005328

Edwin, W. (2025). The Role of Christian Teachers based on Denpasar Local Wisdom in Developing Connectivist Learning in the Era of Digital Transformation. 5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54170/harati.v5i1.756

Feldmeier, R. (2024). From the wise child of God to the homeless poet and persecuted prophet to the heavenly interpreter of Scripture: Jesus as teacher in the Gospel of Luke; [Vom weisen Gotteskind über den heimatlosen Dichter und verfolgten Propheten zum himmlischen Schriftausleger Jesus als Lehrer im Lukasevangelium]. Islamic History and Civilization, 207, 124 – 140. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004682504_013

Franklin, K. J. (2020). A missiology of progress: Assessing advancement in the bible translation movement. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 76(1), 1 – 9. https://doi.org/10.4102/HTS.V76I1.5786

Gemeinhardt, P. (2024). Teachers of faith in the early church: Jesus Christ and his ground staff; [Lehrer des Glaubens in der Alten Kirche: Jesus Christus und sein Bodenpersonal]. Islamic History and Civilization, 207, 101 – 123. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004682504_012

Goldie, J. G. S. (2016). Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age? Medical Teacher, 38(10), 1064–1069. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173661

Green, J. L., Manski, S. E., Hansen, T. A., & Broatch, J. E. (2022). Descriptive statistics. In International Encyclopedia of Education: Fourth Edition (pp. 723–733). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.10083-1

Griffiths, T., & Guile, D. (2003). A Connective Model of Learning: The Implications for Work Process Knowledge. European Educational Research Journal, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2003.2.1.10

Hamilton, T. (2019). Respect. In Transforming the Heart of Practice: An Organizational and Personal Approach to Physician Wellbeing (pp. 73–79). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15250-5_6

Haythornthwaite, C. (2019). Learning, connectivity and networks. Information and Learning Science, 120(1–2), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-06-2018-0052

Henson, G., Williams, D., Blair, A., & Thompson, P. (2025). Coworkers in the Vineyard: A Renewed Spirit of Collaboration Within Theological Education. Christian Higher Education, 24(2), 209 – 225. https://doi.org/10.1080/15363759.2025.2466714

Herbst, M. (2023). Lebensrhythmen in der Moderne und das Gemeinschaftsleben in der Kirche1. Theologische Beitrage, 54(5–6), 333 – 351. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85183891672&partnerID=40&md5=2935732bae486792b28f9666bd67e98f

Hoch, M. L., McCarty, R., Gurvitz, D., & Sitkoski, I. (2019). Five Key Principles: Guided Inquiry With Multimodal Text Sets. Reading Teacher, 72(6), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1781

Housand, B. C. (2021). Fighting Fake News! Teaching Critical Thinking and Media Literacy in a Digital Age: Grades 4-6. In Fighting Fake News! Teaching Critical Thinking and Media Literacy in a Digital Age: Grades 4-6. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003235200

Huang, L., Feng, X., Chen, P., Wang, R., & Luo, S. (2020). Research on the Relationships of Interactions in Connectivist Learning Based on Social Network Analysis. In X. Y., H. Y.-M., W. J., Z. H., & H. J.-P. (Eds.), Proceedings - 2020 9th International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology, EITT 2020 (pp. 176 – 181). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/EITT50754.2020.00038

Husaj, S. (2015). Connectivism and Connective Learning. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. https://doi.org/10.5901/ajis.2015.v4n1s2p227

Jancarik, A. (2010). Connectivist approaches to student evaluation. 9th European Conference on ELearning 2010, ECEL 2010, 259–265. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84901984635&partnerID=40&md5=48aed0ecf403b7b6b44eede1575ce996

Jankowski, K. R. B., Flannelly, K. J., & Flannelly, L. T. (2018). The t-test: An Influential Inferential Tool in Chaplaincy and Other Healthcare Research. Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy, 24(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/08854726.2017.1335050

Jonatan, J., & Waruwu, A. T. M. (2023). Peran Teknologi Digital dalam Pengembangan Pembelajaran Kristen di Era Digital. ANTHOR: Education and Learning Journal, 2(6). https://doi.org/10.31004/anthor.v2i6.233

Jung, I. (2019). Connectivism and networked learning. In SpringerBriefs in Open and Distance Education (pp. 47–55). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7740-2_6

Kaak, P., & LaPorte, M. (2021). A Faith-Informed Model for Experiential Learning Applied to Faith Integrated Service-Learning. Christian Higher Education, 21(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1080/15363759.2021.2004563

Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v9i3.523

Kriksciuniene, D., Sakalauskas, V., & Lewandowski, R. (2019). Evaluating the Interdependent Effect for Likert Scale Items. In W. Abramowicz & R. Corchuelo (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing: Vol. 373 LNBIP (pp. 26–38). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36691-9_3

Krysa, J. (2015). THE POLITICS OF CONTEMPORARY CURATING: A Network Perspective. In The Routledge Companion to Art and Politics (pp. 114–121). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315736693-14

Kumi-Yeboah, A., & Amponsah, S. (2023). An exploratory study of instructors’ perceptions on inclusion of culturally responsive pedagogy in online education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(4), 878–897. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13299

Kusmaryono, I., Wijayanti, D., & Maharani, H. R. (2022). Number of Response Options, Reliability, Validity, and Potential Bias in the Use of the Likert Scale Education and Social Science Research: A Literature Review. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(4), 625–637. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.4.625

Lee, J. (2019). Statistics, Descriptive. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, Second Edition (pp. 13–20). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10428-7

Lumbantoruan, W. (2021). Peran Pendidik Kristen terhadap Dampak New Morality dari Era Digital. SIKIP: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Kristen, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.52220/sikip.v2i1.78

Masengwe, G., & Dube, B. (2023). Retrospective and Prospective Approaches to Christian Education in Church of Christ Schools in Zimbabwe. Religions, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14091120

Mau, M. L., Oka, G. P. A., & Meka, M. (2023). PENGEMBANGAN MEDIA PAPAN PINTAR ANGKA UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR SIMBOLIK PADA ANAK USIA 4-5 TAHUN. Jurnal Citra Pendidikan Anak, 2(3), 644–653. https://doi.org/10.38048/jcpa.v2i3.1125

McKinney, S. J., & Hill, R. J. (2016). Jesus as Teacher: Reading the Gospel for New Perspectives. In Education in a Catholic Perspective. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315578835-15

Mishra, P., Singh, U., Pandey, C. M., Mishra, P., & Pandey, G. (2019). Application of student’s t-test, analysis of variance, and covariance. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 22(4), 407–411. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_94_19

Mukhlis, H., Haenilah, E. Y., Maulina, D., & Nursafitri, L. (2024). Connectivism and digital age education: Insights, challenges, and future directions. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 45(3), 803–814. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2024.45.3.11

Nazari, B., Hussin, A. R. B. C., & Niknejad, N. (2021). Connectivism: Promising Constructs to the E-Learning Systems Success. 2021 International Congress of Advanced Technology and Engineering, ICOTEN 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOTEN52080.2021.9493566

O’Toole, T., & Holden, M. T. (2013). A relational communication strategy for successful collaborative innovation in business-to-business markets. In Strategy and Communication for Innovation (pp. 271–292). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41479-4_16

Park, S., Freeman, J., & Middleton, C. (2019). Intersections between connectivity and digital inclusion in rural communities. Communication Research and Practice, 5(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2019.1601493

Pickard, S. (2009). Theological foundations for collaborative ministry. In Theological Foundations for Collaborative Ministry. Ashgate Publishing Ltd. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84899338947&partnerID=40&md5=b757dc109147e3c735730a3093d0a85d

Pickard, S. K. (2010). The collaborative character of Christian ministry. Expository Times, 121(9), 429 – 436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014524610366079

Preece, C., Rojas-Gaviria, P., Cappellini, B., Kerrigan, F., Hewer, P., Higgins, L., & Sobande, F. (2025). Let’s ROC: a dynamic experience-based roadmap for relational engagement. European Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-04-2024-0333

Rahmawati, M., & Suryadi, E. (2019). Guru sebagai fasilitator dan efektivitas belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/jpm.v4i1.14954

Rendón-Macías, M. E., Villasís-Keever, M. Á., & Miranda-Novales, M. G. (2016). Descriptive statistics. Revista Alergia Mexico, 63(4), 397–407. https://doi.org/10.29262/ram.v63i4.230

Rytkönen, A., & Kaivola, T. (2009). Collaborative Networking for the Development of Quality in Education at University Level. In IFIP AICT (Vol. 307).

Sanchez, J. M. (2023). The Need to Reinforce the Teaching of Basic Descriptive Statistics Required in Reporting Quantitative Laboratory Results: Diagnose of Common Students’ Misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(7), 2713–2718. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00394

Sapitri, N., Sahwal, S. S., Satifah, D., & Takziyah, N. (2023). Peran Guru Profesional Sebagai Fasilitator Dalam Kegiatan Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. CaXra: Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.31980/caxra.v3i1.2625

Shankar, Ch., Sahyaja, & Basha, S. C. (2024). Diving Into the Complexity of Social Networking: Moving Beyond Likes and Shares. Proceedings - 2024 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Social Networking, ICPCSN 2024, 617 – 624. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPCSN62568.2024.00103

Sihotang, H. (2020). Penggunaan Media Teknologi Informasi dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Kristen di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. IMMANUEL: Jurnal Teologi Dan Pendidikan Kristen, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.46305/im.v1i2.16

Suliman, Nawangsari, D., & Sutomo, Moh. (2023). Policy Patterns and The Application of Digital Literacy in Increasing Students’ Religious Motivation. Munaddhomah, 4(3), 516 – 527. https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v4i3.363

Thomas, K. (2015). The Practice of Collaboration as Ethical Activity in Art/s Education? International Journal of Art and Design Education, 34(3), 296 – 308. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12085

Thompson, M. (2013). Are content curators the new editors? EContent, 36(5), 12–17. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84879123146&partnerID=40&md5=4a8d5d4cc22ebdfca66d3d5a259124ea

Thukral, S., Kovac, S., & Paturu, M. (2023). t-test. In Translational Interventional Radiology (pp. 139–143). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823026-8.00104-8

Transue, B. M. (2013). Connectivism and Information Literacy: Moving From Learning Theory to Pedagogical Practice. Public Services Quarterly, 9(3), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2013.815501

Tschofen, C., & Mackness, J. (2012). Connectivism and dimensions of individual experience. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 124–143. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1143

Üstek, F. (2019). The Impact of Context Specificity in Curating amidst the Forces at Play in a Globalized World of Realms. In A Companion to Curation (pp. 291–305). wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119206880.ch16

Vartiainen, H., Leinonen, T., & Nissinen, S. (2019). Connected learning with media tools in kindergarten: an illustrative case. Educational Media International, 56(3), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2019.1669877

Vetter, T. R. (2017). Descriptive Statistics: Reporting the Answers to the 5 Basic Questions of Who, What, Why, When, Where, and a Sixth, so What? Anesthesia and Analgesia, 125(5), 1797–1802. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002471

Vrabec, N., Polievková, P., & Morav?íková, M. (2013). The role of media literacy development as a part of religious education curriculum. European Journal of Science and Theology, 9(5), 211 – 223. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84886425406&partnerID=40&md5=c73df6504bf22c3253ae772a4ded201a

Wang, Z., Anderson, T., Chen, L., & Barbera, E. (2017). Interaction pattern analysis in cMOOCs based on the connectivist interaction and engagement framework. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 683 – 699. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12433

Wu, H., & Leung, S.-O. (2017). Can Likert Scales be Treated as Interval Scales?—A Simulation Study. Journal of Social Service Research, 43(4), 527–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2017.1329775

Downloads

Published

2025-07-13